Maxim 5.1.34
Two cannot possess or own one thing in entirety.
Source: Co. Litt. 368; Dig. 13, 6, 5, 15; Bract. fol. 28b; Weisman, 91dd
Difficulty 2/5 — Approachable
Explanation
(English-origin maxim.) Sole and exclusive possession cannot vest simultaneously in two separate persons — co-ownership is possible, but two claims of total dominion over the same thing are mutually exclusive.
Where this applies
- Two brothers each claim to be the sole and exclusive owner of the same horse — the law says they cannot both have total dominion, so one claim must fail.
- A husband and wife both claim sole ownership of a car titled only in one name — two people cannot each exclusively possess the same thing.
- Two companies each insist they alone own the patent, but absolute sole ownership cannot vest in both simultaneously.
Legal domains
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 5.1.34 — Two cannot possess or own one thing in entirety. — Co. Litt. 368; Dig. 13, 6, 5, 15; Bract. fol. 28b; Weisman, 91dd
Found an error? Suggest a correction →