Maxim 4.3.17
One is a servant who is employed by a master to perform service in his affairs and whose physical conduct in performance of the service is controlled by the master.
Source: Evans v. Board of Ed. of Hays, 284 P. 2d 1068, 1071; Weisman, 96h
Difficulty 4/5 — Advanced
Explanation
(English-origin maxim.) The defining feature of the master-servant relationship is the master's right to control the physical conduct of the servant's performance — cite this to distinguish an employee from an independent contractor.
Where this applies
- A company hires a worker and controls exactly how and when he performs every task; the court classifies him as a servant — not an independent contractor — because the master controls the physical conduct of the work.
- A hospital directs a janitor's schedule, methods, and specific duties; when the janitor injures a patient through negligence, the hospital is liable because the janitor is a servant under its physical control.
- A ride-sharing company argues its drivers are independent contractors, but the court finds the company controls routes, pricing, and performance standards, making the drivers servants under this definition.
Legal domains
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 4.3.17 — One is a servant who is employed by a master to perform service in his affairs and whose physical conduct in performance of the service is controlled by the master. — Evans v. Board of Ed. of Hays, 284 P. 2d 1068, 1071; Weisman, 96h
Found an error? Suggest a correction →