Maxim 3.2.14
Identity ordinarily connotes exactness.
Source: Gordon v. Gordon, 59 So.2d 40, 44; Weisman, 56d
Difficulty 3/5 — Intermediate
Explanation
(English-origin maxim.) Proof of identity requires exactness — invoke this maxim to challenge an identification that rests on approximate or general similarities rather than precise correspondence.
Where this applies
- A witness identifies the suspect as approximately six feet tall with dark hair, but the defense argues that such a vague description fails the standard of exactness required for positive identification.
- A bank refuses to release funds because the name on the withdrawal slip is spelled slightly differently from the account holder's name, insisting that identity requires precision.
- A forensic analyst testifies that a partial fingerprint with only seven matching points is insufficient because identity demands exactness, not mere similarity.
Legal domains
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 3.2.14 — Identity ordinarily connotes exactness. — Gordon v. Gordon, 59 So.2d 40, 44; Weisman, 56d
Found an error? Suggest a correction →