Skip to content
NeCede's

Maxim 3.2.14

Identity ordinarily connotes exactness.

Source: Gordon v. Gordon, 59 So.2d 40, 44; Weisman, 56d Difficulty 3/5 — Intermediate

Explanation

(English-origin maxim.) Proof of identity requires exactness — invoke this maxim to challenge an identification that rests on approximate or general similarities rather than precise correspondence.

Where this applies

  • A witness identifies the suspect as approximately six feet tall with dark hair, but the defense argues that such a vague description fails the standard of exactness required for positive identification.
  • A bank refuses to release funds because the name on the withdrawal slip is spelled slightly differently from the account holder's name, insisting that identity requires precision.
  • A forensic analyst testifies that a partial fingerprint with only seven matching points is insufficient because identity demands exactness, not mere similarity.

Legal domains

Cite this maxim

NeCede Max. 3.2.14 — Identity ordinarily connotes exactness. — Gordon v. Gordon, 59 So.2d 40, 44; Weisman, 56d

Found an error? Suggest a correction →