An inconvenience does not solve an argument.

Explanation

The fact that a legal proposition leads to practical inconvenience does not refute its logical validity; inconvenience may call for legislative remedy but does not defeat a sound argument.

Where this applies

• The proposition leads to inconvenient results but that doesn't make it logically wrong.
• Inconvenience calls for a legislative fix but doesn't defeat a sound legal argument.
• Just because the outcome is inconvenient doesn't mean the argument is invalid.