Maxim 6.1.11
Consent removes error; acquiescence in error takes away the right of objecting to it.
Consensus tollit errorem.
Source: Co. Litt. 126; 2 Inst. 123; Broom, Max. 129; Rogers v. Cruger, 7 Johns. 611; Wharton
Difficulty 2/5 — Approachable
Explanation
A party who consents to or acquiesces in an error, knowing of it and having the opportunity to object, waives his right to later challenge it — consent cures defects, but only where the acquiescence itself is free and informed.
Where this applies
- There was an error in the contract but both parties went ahead and performed anyway.
- I knew the paperwork had a mistake but I accepted it without objection.
Topics
Legal domains
See also
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 6.1.11 — Consent removes error; acquiescence in error takes away the right of objecting to it. — Co. Litt. 126; 2 Inst. 123; Broom, Max. 129; Rogers v. Cruger, 7 Johns. 611; Wharton (Consensus tollit errorem.)
Found an error? Suggest a correction →